Hm.
So, I'm watching a Brief History of Time. They're talking about Black Holes and what would happen if someone would enter one. I like how the scientists speak of these things as they know with %100 WTF is gonna happen. Have the ydone it? have they experienced it? What makes them different from, say, a priest? With science as their religion?
Yes, yes. Scientific basis, etc, etc. But the scientific methos itself asks for experimentation based hypothesis and until this hypothesis is tested in a reproducable manner, then it is just that, theroy and not Law. If not Law then not fact. So I don't see a difference between the Big Bang Theory and the Theory of Creation.
If we can't teach Creationism in school then we shouldn't teach Big Bang in school? Why? Creation is attached to Christianity and Judaism, but Big Bang is attached to Atheism/Agnosticism.
Now let's all wait for Ken to denounce me, poop on religion and have sex with the Big Bang Theory. Cue Ken:
Yes, yes. Scientific basis, etc, etc. But the scientific methos itself asks for experimentation based hypothesis and until this hypothesis is tested in a reproducable manner, then it is just that, theroy and not Law. If not Law then not fact. So I don't see a difference between the Big Bang Theory and the Theory of Creation.
If we can't teach Creationism in school then we shouldn't teach Big Bang in school? Why? Creation is attached to Christianity and Judaism, but Big Bang is attached to Atheism/Agnosticism.
Now let's all wait for Ken to denounce me, poop on religion and have sex with the Big Bang Theory. Cue Ken:
1 Comments:
this is gonna be good, i can tell.....
Post a Comment
<< Home